MODELLING AND FEA OF HOUSINGLESS STAND HOT ROLLING MILL FOR PRODUCTION OF TMT STEEL BAR

Pratik C. Dhumatkar; Dr. Nilesh S. Pohokar; Prof. Saurabh S. Bhange

doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/ZCXJK

Authors

Pratik C. Dhumatkar Post-Graduate Student, Dept. of Mech. Engg, PRMIT&R, Badnera-Amravati
Dr. Nilesh S. Pohokar Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mech. Engg, PRMIT&R, Badnera-Amravati
Prof. Saurabh S. Bhange Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mech. Engg, PRMIT&R, Badnera-Amravati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZCXJK

Keywords:

CAE, Rolling Mills, CATIA, Analysis

Abstract

Rolling is described as a manner wherein steel is fashioned through a couple of revolving rolls with simple or grooved barrels. The steel modifications its form steadily all through the length, wherein it's far in touch with the 2 rolls. Rolling is a first-rate and a maximum extensively used mechanical running technique.

The present work entails the optimization of Rolling Mill Housings layout for rigidity, to manipulate the deflection of the housing for higher gage manage of the cloth being rolled. The Housing pressure distribution has been analyzed in the use of evaluation software program CATIA from which most static pressure at crucial regions had been calculated. Structural conduct of housing beneath the given loading and boundary situations, the use of an analytical version could be very difficult.

Therefore, 3-D strong version changed into selected with the intention to are expecting the pressure and pressure reaction detail. We have made a prototype of Rolling Mill Housing of optimized layout of 1:10 scale in order to affirm our outcomes which have been given via way of means of the evaluation of Rolling Mill Housing on evaluation software program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

SDRC report project number 17140, ‘Final Report on ARMCO Mill Stand Evaluation’, June1990.

G. P. Steven, ‘Multicriteria optimization that minimizes maximum stress and maximizes stiffness’, Computers & Structures Volume 80, Issues 27-30 , November 2002, Pages 2433-2448

J. H. Rong, ‘An improved method for evolutionary structural optimization against buckling’Computers & Structures ,Volume 79, Issue 3 , January 2001, Pages 253-263.

Kurt Maute, ‘An interactive method for the selection of design criteria and the formulation ofoptimization problems in computer aided optimal design’, Computers Volume 82, Issue1, January 2004, Pages 71-79.

Theodore G. ToRidis, ‘Computer analysis of rigid frames, Computers‘, Volume 1, Issues 1-2 , August 1971, Pages 193-221.

William Prager ,’Conditions for structural optimality’, Computers & Structures’,Volume 2, Issues 5-6 , 1972, Pages 833-840

Rafael Febres, ‘Modeling of local buckling in tubular steel frames subjected to cyclic loading’ , Computers & Structures ,Volume 81, Issues 22-23 ,September 2003.

K. G. Mahmoud, ‘An efficient approach to structural optimization ’ Computers & Structures olume 64, Issues 1-4, July-August 1997,Pages 97-112 Computational Structures Technology

V. Braibant, ‘Optimization techniques: Synthesis of design and analysis’, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design Volume 3, Issue 1 , April 1987, Pages 57-78

Yunliang Ding, ‘Multilevel optimization of frames with beams including buckling constraints’, Computers Volume, 1989, Pages 249-261

M. E. M. El-Sayed, ‘Structural optimization with fatigue life constraints’, Engineering Fracture Mechanics Volume 37, Issue 6 , 1990, Pages 1149-1156

M. Haririan, ‘Use of ADINA for design optimization of nonlinear structures’, Computers & Structures Volume 26, Issues 1-2 , 1987, Pages 123-133

Michael A. Vehmeier, ‘A new method for simultaneous structural/control optimization’ Mathematical and Computer Modeling Volume 14 , 1990, Pages 248-253

Tselikov, A.I., Theory of calculation of forces in Rolling Mills 1962.

SAE Bearings manual.